In College Computer Science Majors worry a lot about the optimal solution to algorithmic problems. What is the optimal solution? Is it in logarithmic or polynomial time? Did you pass or fail the test? My Algorithms class had a group class competition to see which team could find the best solution to a particular algorithmic problem.
Then when they start looking for jobs they run into whiteboarding interviews where they are supposed to find the optimal solution in 50 minutes so we have time for questions.
But once you enter the workforce, no one cares about the optimal solution anymore. If you look at the Solutions pyramid above there only one optimal solution. But right underneath there are 10 excellent solutions and a 100 good solutions. In the corporate world a good solution is an A grade, and an acceptable solution is passing. Typically as long as a enterprise software project avoids clearly ‘bad’ algorithms it will probably meet its throughput and latency goals.
When your team has found multiple approaches to solving a problem and can’t seem to agree on the ‘right’ one. Ask yourself whether any of the solutions are in a higher level of the pyramid than the others. Don’t try to find the best solution, try to get a solution from the highest level of the pyramid implemented. And if all the proposed solutions are from the same level of the pyramid, sit back and relax, it doesn’t matter who wins.
Some companies try to avoid developing software that doesn’t directly contribute to making money. Other companies do the opposite and try to only use internal software. Falling into the “not invented here” trap.
Large software companies fall into a different failure case where they build large massively integrated internal development platforms.
At the beginning these companies were solving a problem that had no existing solution and they correctly chose to create internal solutions.
But it has been a long time. You should not be maintaining your own containerization system anymore. Use Docker.
But for a big tech company moving to docker could be a five year effort costing millions. It is easier to keep the old system.
That large tech company gradually becomes trapped by internal software, that the rest of the industry has never heard of. As the company’s internal tech stack drifts away from the rest of the industry employees pay less attention to the mainstream.
Eventually the company loses perspective on what they are missing. The people who have worked there the longest who have the most power to improve things think the internal software is better.
These companies are big enough that they have internal developer conference where employees can learn about the latest in internal tooling.
Today most of the components of these stacks are worse than the industry mainstream alternative. But there is no upgrade path on the horizon.